![]() ![]() Albuquerque likens her job as an analytical chemist to that of a crime scene investigator. Of course, the real world is more complicated than this, because the union can hire trained negotiators or whatever, but your simplistic model of "max(individual rate, group rate) so everyone wins" makes no sense.Dr. Obviously negotiating in the latter situation would be easier to pull off. Without such a regime, a negotiated $10k raise for yourself only costs the company $10k. Under a regime where everyone's pay is automatically bumped up to the highest rate, if you're trying to negotiate a $10k raise for yourself, you're actually negotiating for the company to part with $1M ($10k * 1000 employees). Suppose there's a company with 100 non-supervisory employees, each of which $200k worth of value for the company, gets paid $100k. Now you get paid max(individual rate, group rate).Įxcept this misses the fact that negotiating for your own pay raise is now suddenly harder. Everyone in the same position gets paid the same, if anyone negotiates higher for themselves everyone gets a pay bump to match. > You can have both ways which I'm shocked isn't more common. If the offer is accepted, the strike ends up being a short one and if it is rejected - the struggle continues with the "wind in their sails". But when an offer is made just before a strike, naturally - the strike proceeds, and the offer is discussed in parallel with the strike. This is usually accompanied by union leadership publishing glowing descriptions of all of the wonderful gains, usually in vague and confusing terms never listing the set of original goals and not mentioning what concessions were made.Īn uncorrupted union would never calls off a strike because of an employer proposition: If the proposition/proposed contract is offered enough time before the strike was decided, then it is brought up for discussion - with the negotiations team presenting both the benefits and the detriments: What they got and what they conceded and the result of the discussion decides the fate of the planned strike. If, however, the leadership has "taken the wind out of the sails" of the struggle, the demobilized workers have the gotten the message that their struggle is over and there's nothing to be done, and are much more likely to accept it. You see, the workers are not very likely to accept a bad deal if they've just come out on strike - even if their leadership has made excessive concessions in the negotiations and is putting it up to a vote. The reason to call of a strike is actually to be able to pass a _bad_ deal. Rather than stop, the user instead opted to do their overzealous free-market trolling from their normal account. Dang ended up called out the pattern, asking the user to "stop using this account" to start low-effort flame wars. ![]() I know because I got it to impersonate both Dang and myself, at which it excelled it also did a very good job of explaining style of any given user's writing here on HN.ġ: Fun 2nd digression: the account I'm satirizing originally used a throwaway account for all of the zealous free-market flame posts. I would then follow you down a rabbit hole where I post 2-3 sentence glib retorts.ĭigression: I could have done a lot better in the days before they locked down the vast majority of ChatGPT's capabilities. This negatively affects the company, and if the trend spreads ends up making the entire U.S. Both in terms of the needs of individual workers and the efficiency of the company to deliver products/services. Unions work on their own behalf and distort the market. I'm thinking specifically of the non-programming posts of a regular HN'er programmer. Hm, I can almost see the standard HN response here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |